110
immediate payment be made to A-Hok of the total sum of $20,551.70, and to Foo Sik of $1,019.19, the case against Mr. Belilios be either referred to arbitration or brought to some conclusion by compromise.
The question was asked by His Excellency Sir Henry Blake, whether it followed that because Mr. Chatham was not authorised by Mr. Belilios, who paid him, he was necessarily acting under the authority of Government. To this it was replied by the Acting Attorney General: that from a legal point of view Mr. Chatham must clearly be considered, so far as A-Hok was concerned, as standing in the shoes of the Public Works Department, and that the Government was therefore liable to A-Hok for the amount already stated.
He repeated that all the Government would have to go upon in disputing A-Hok's claim in a court of law would be the chance of another jury taking a different view upon the question of agency from that taken by the jury in the former suit, that is to say, the chance of their upholding the authority of the Public Works Department to bind Mr. Belilios to A-Hok by contract.
On April 13th, 1899 the Acting Treasurer had an interview with Mr. Belilios on the subject of a compromise, but had to report that Mr. Belilios absolutely declined any compromise whatever. On February 16th, Mr. Belilios had offered to pay the Government the sum of $1,425 as representing a total sum of $7,925 less the $6,500 which he had already paid.
110
immediate payment be made to A-Hok of the total sum
or $20,551.70. and to Foo Sik of $1,019.19, the case
against Mr. Belilios be either referred to arbitration
or brought to some conclusion by compromise.
The question was asked by His Excellency
Sir Henry Blake, whether it followed that because Mr.
Chatham was not authorised by Mr. Belilios, who paid
him, he was necessarily acting under the authority
of Government. To this it was replied by the Acting
Attorney General: that from a legal point of view Mr.
Chatham must clearly be considered, so far as A-Hok
was concerned, as standing in the shoes of the Public
Works Department, and that the Government was there-
fore liable to A-Hok for the amount already stated.:
He repeated that all the Government would have to go
upon in disputing A-Hok's claim in a court of law
would be the chance of another jury taking a different
view upon the question of agency from that taken by
the jury in the former suit, that is to say, the
chance of their upholding the authority of the Public
Works Department to bind Mr. Belilios to A-Hok by
contract.
On April 13th. 1899 the Acting Treasurer
had an interview with Mr. Belilios on the subject
of a compromise, but had to report that Mr. Belilios
absolutely declined any compromise whatever. On
February 16th. Mr. Belilios had offered to pay the
Government the sum of $1,425 as representing a total
sum of $7,925 less the $6,500 which he had already
paid.'
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.