CO129-294 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [10-12] — Page 113

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

110

immediate payment be made to A-Hok of the total sum of $20,551.70, and to Foo Sik of $1,019.19, the case against Mr. Belilios be either referred to arbitration or brought to some conclusion by compromise.

The question was asked by His Excellency Sir Henry Blake, whether it followed that because Mr. Chatham was not authorised by Mr. Belilios, who paid him, he was necessarily acting under the authority of Government. To this it was replied by the Acting Attorney General: that from a legal point of view Mr. Chatham must clearly be considered, so far as A-Hok was concerned, as standing in the shoes of the Public Works Department, and that the Government was therefore liable to A-Hok for the amount already stated.

He repeated that all the Government would have to go upon in disputing A-Hok's claim in a court of law would be the chance of another jury taking a different view upon the question of agency from that taken by the jury in the former suit, that is to say, the chance of their upholding the authority of the Public Works Department to bind Mr. Belilios to A-Hok by contract.

On April 13th, 1899 the Acting Treasurer had an interview with Mr. Belilios on the subject of a compromise, but had to report that Mr. Belilios absolutely declined any compromise whatever. On February 16th, Mr. Belilios had offered to pay the Government the sum of $1,425 as representing a total sum of $7,925 less the $6,500 which he had already paid.

Edit History

2026-05-31 08:59:04 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
110 immediate payment be made to A-Hok of the total sum of $20,551.70, and to Foo Sik of $1,019.19, the case against Mr. Belilios be either referred to arbitration or brought to some conclusion by compromise. The question was asked by His Excellency Sir Henry Blake, whether it followed that because Mr. Chatham was not authorised by Mr. Belilios, who paid him, he was necessarily acting under the authority of Government. To this it was replied by the Acting Attorney General: that from a legal point of view Mr. Chatham must clearly be considered, so far as A-Hok was concerned, as standing in the shoes of the Public Works Department, and that the Government was therefore liable to A-Hok for the amount already stated. He repeated that all the Government would have to go upon in disputing A-Hok's claim in a court of law would be the chance of another jury taking a different view upon the question of agency from that taken by the jury in the former suit, that is to say, the chance of their upholding the authority of the Public Works Department to bind Mr. Belilios to A-Hok by contract. On April 13th, 1899 the Acting Treasurer had an interview with Mr. Belilios on the subject of a compromise, but had to report that Mr. Belilios absolutely declined any compromise whatever. On February 16th, Mr. Belilios had offered to pay the Government the sum of $1,425 as representing a total sum of $7,925 less the $6,500 which he had already paid.
Baseline (Original)
110 immediate payment be made to A-Hok of the total sum or $20,551.70. and to Foo Sik of $1,019.19, the case against Mr. Belilios be either referred to arbitration or brought to some conclusion by compromise. The question was asked by His Excellency Sir Henry Blake, whether it followed that because Mr. Chatham was not authorised by Mr. Belilios, who paid him, he was necessarily acting under the authority of Government. To this it was replied by the Acting Attorney General: that from a legal point of view Mr. Chatham must clearly be considered, so far as A-Hok was concerned, as standing in the shoes of the Public Works Department, and that the Government was there- fore liable to A-Hok for the amount already stated.: He repeated that all the Government would have to go upon in disputing A-Hok's claim in a court of law would be the chance of another jury taking a different view upon the question of agency from that taken by the jury in the former suit, that is to say, the chance of their upholding the authority of the Public Works Department to bind Mr. Belilios to A-Hok by contract. On April 13th. 1899 the Acting Treasurer had an interview with Mr. Belilios on the subject of a compromise, but had to report that Mr. Belilios absolutely declined any compromise whatever. On February 16th. Mr. Belilios had offered to pay the Government the sum of $1,425 as representing a total sum of $7,925 less the $6,500 which he had already paid.'
2026-05-31 08:59:04 · Baseline
View content

110

immediate payment be made to A-Hok of the total sum

or $20,551.70. and to Foo Sik of $1,019.19, the case

against Mr. Belilios be either referred to arbitration

or brought to some conclusion by compromise.

The question was asked by His Excellency

Sir Henry Blake, whether it followed that because Mr.

Chatham was not authorised by Mr. Belilios, who paid

him, he was necessarily acting under the authority

of Government. To this it was replied by the Acting

Attorney General: that from a legal point of view Mr.

Chatham must clearly be considered, so far as A-Hok

was concerned, as standing in the shoes of the Public

Works Department, and that the Government was there-

fore liable to A-Hok for the amount already stated.:

He repeated that all the Government would have to go

upon in disputing A-Hok's claim in a court of law

would be the chance of another jury taking a different

view upon the question of agency from that taken by

the jury in the former suit, that is to say, the

chance of their upholding the authority of the Public

Works Department to bind Mr. Belilios to A-Hok by

contract.

On April 13th. 1899 the Acting Treasurer

had an interview with Mr. Belilios on the subject

of a compromise, but had to report that Mr. Belilios

absolutely declined any compromise whatever. On

February 16th. Mr. Belilios had offered to pay the

Government the sum of $1,425 as representing a total

sum of $7,925 less the $6,500 which he had already

paid.'

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.